Search Results for "Rash and Negligent Driving"

1431 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1431 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Dismissal of Driver for Rash Driving Causing Accident. KSRTC's Disciplinary Action Validated as Accident Resulted from Negligent Driving, Not Mechanical Failure.

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) filed a writ petition challenging an award dated 12.10.2018 passed by the Principal District Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Examines Motor Accident Claims Appeals Involving Exoneration of Insurer. The case turns on whether non-renewal of transport endorsement on a driving licence constitutes absence of valid licence, affecting insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

These appeals arose from motor accident claims following a collision on 05.04.2012 between a Tata Ace vehicle (KA-35/A-7411) and a lorry (KA-16/A-4378...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Case — Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below not interfered with as no perversity or illegality found.

The petitioner, Athaulla, was convicted by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gudibande in C.C.No.16/2007 for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case — Concurrent Findings of Misconduct Not Interfered With. Petitioner failed to maintain safe distance causing three deaths; Labour Court and Industrial Court concurrently upheld dismissal as proportionate punishment.

The petitioner, Syed Mumtaz Syed Moosa, was employed as a driver with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (respondent) since 1984. On 9th...