Search Results for "Prime Minister Employment Scheme"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Promotion Dispute Against Co-operative Bank — Bank Not 'State' Under Article 12. Employee's Claim for Promotion to Deputy Chief Officer Fails as Technical Cadre Employee Not Entitled to Consideration for General Cadre Post.

The appellant, Sudhir Chatarpal Kedar, a Civil Engineer, was appointed as Engineer/Officer Grade-I in the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank in July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Peon in Prevention of Corruption Case Due to Unproved Demand and Doubtful Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Reversed as Complainant Admitted False Affidavit and Bribe Venue Changed Unexplainedly.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, a peon at the District Industrial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Jeevan Aadhar Policy Condition That Annuity Payable Only After Death of Proposer Under Section 80DD Income Tax Act. Court Holds That Policy Terms Align with Statutory Scheme and No Violation of Article 14.

The petitioner, Ravi Agrawal, a differently abled person, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...