Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 2008"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Pension Regulations Army 2008"

34 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Consideration for Permanent Commission to Short Service Commission Officers in Indian Navy with Transparent Criteria. The court found the selection process lacked fairness and transparency, requiring reconsideration under Regulations 122(14) and 203 of the Regulations for the Navy Part III, 1963, framed under the Navy Act, 1957, to address legitimate expectations and non-discrimination.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a group of approximately 25 Short Service Commission Officers, predominantly women, in the Indian Navy who sought Permanen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Ex-Servicemen's Claims for Full Disability Pension Arrears -- Union of India & Ors. Appeal Dismissed -- Judgment in Rem Overrides Limitation Periods for Recurring Pension Rights Under Armed Forces Tribunal Act

12 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed multiple civil appeals concerning arrears of disability pension for ex-servicemen -- The central issue was whether arrears...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension to Ex-Serviceman for Primary Hypertension. Disability Not Attributable to Military Service as Onset Occurred in Peace Station, Contrary to Para 179 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961.

7 Mar 2025

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a discharged Havi...

High Court

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Regarding Disability Pension for Ex-Serviceman with Psychiatric Disability. Petitioner Contends Medical Board's Opinion on Aggravation by Military Service Is Conclusive Under Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, Regulation 186(2).

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, an ex-sepoy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging the orders ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Armed Forces Tribunal Order Denying Disability Pension to Soldier Discharged on Medical Ground of Schizophrenia. Court Holds Petitioner Not Entitled to Disability Pension as Disability is Neither Attributable to Nor Aggravated by Military Service Under Rule 173 of Pension Regulation for Army 1961.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Ex-No.15429601-N Sepoy Valthati Sikhamani, was enrolled in the Indian Army on 28.09.2009 and was invalidated out from service on 22.06...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition by Union of India and Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Disability Pension Under Regulation 37. Disability Caused by Lifestyle Diseases and Service in Peace Station Not Attributable to Military Service, as Per Release Medical Board's Recorded Reasons.

4 Feb 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Union of India and others challenging the order dated 03.03.2022 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Widow and Children for Family Pension Despite Bigamous Marriage — Second Marriage Valid After Divorce from First Wife, Entitlement to Pensionary Benefits Upheld. The court held that the marriage of appellant No.1 with the deceased, though void at inception due to subsistence of earlier marriage, became valid after the divorce of the first wife, and the appellants are entitled to family pension under the Army Pension Regulations.

22 Aug 2023

The case pertains to a dispute over family pension of Late Subedar Pundalik Bhave, who served in the Indian Army. The appellants are Smt. Shiramabai (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Cut-off Date in Pension Revision for Pre-1996 Retired Judicial Officers. Government Resolution Denying Revised Pension to Pre-1996 Retirees Violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

6 May 2021

The petitioner, Raghavendra Anantrai Mehta, a retired District and Sessions Judge who retired on 30th September 1991, filed a writ petition under Arti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Women Navy Officers' Right to Permanent Commission — Policy Denying Consideration to Existing SSC Officers Held Discriminatory. The court directed grant of Permanent Commissions to women Short Service Commissioned officers in service as on 26 September 2008, under Section 9 of the Navy Act, 1957.

17 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the grant of Permanent Commissions (PCs) to women Short Service Commissioned (SSC) officer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Parents' Petition for Full Family Pension After Widow's Remarriage — Family Pension Entitlement Ceases Upon Remarriage Under Army Pension Regulations. The court upheld the validity of para 11.3 of the letter dated 12.11.2008 and held that parents are not entitled to full family pension after the widow's remarriage.

16 Sep 2015

The petitioners, Smt. Shakuntala Bansidhar Gadekar and Bansidhar s/o Bhaudu Gadekar, are the parents of deceased Vijay Gadekar, who served in the Indi...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)