Search Results for "Patent Refusal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Patent Refusal"

274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Patent Refusal for Lack of Reasoning on Inventive Step. The Court held that the Assistant Controller's order lacked any reasoning as to how the claimed invention was taught by prior art and failed to apply the five-step test for inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, 1970.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Navya Network Inc., filed a petition under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging the order dated 27th May 2024 passed by ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Patent Refusal for Lack of Inventive Step and Enablement. Controller's order upheld as amended claims were not enabled and lacked inventive step under Patents Act, 1970.

29 Jan 2025

The appellant, Caleb Suresh Motupalli, filed a patent application for an invention titled 'Necktie Persona-Extender/Environment-integrator and method ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Concessionaire in Airport Metro Express Line Dispute. The court held that the Delhi High Court's interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was unjustified, as the Arbitral Tribunal's findings on defects and material breach in the concession agreement were based on evidence and within its jurisdiction.

9 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals arising from a dispute between Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the appellant and co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Patent Infringement Suit — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favor Plaintiff. The court upheld the trial court's order restraining the appellants from infringing the respondent's patent, finding no grounds to interfere with the discretionary order.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves two miscellaneous first appeals filed by the appellants, M/s. Inphase Power Technologies Private Limited and its directors, against ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Interim Injunction in Patent Infringement Suit — Appellants Restrained from Using ABB's Patented Method for Controlling Multilevel Inverter. The court found that the respondent's patent was valid and the appellants' product prima facie infringed it, rejecting defenses of prior use and invalidity.

14 Sep 2016

The respondent, M/s. ABB India Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the appellants for infringement of its patent IN 261418 titled '...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable in Arbitration Reference Case. Full Bench holds that an order under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 referring parties to arbitration is not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, as the Arbitration Act is a self-contained code.

27 Nov 2014

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to decide a reference on the maintainability of an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Paten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XIV of Letters Patent to Join Infringement and Passing Off Claims in Single Suit. The court allowed joinder of passing off claim arising outside jurisdiction with infringement claim within jurisdiction to avoid multiplicity of suits.

22 Apr 2013

The plaintiffs, registered proprietors of the trademark 'Cafe Madras', filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants who opened...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Maintainability Upheld as Dispute Not Between Landlord and Tenant. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court's ruling in Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil, holding that the bar on Letters Patent Appeals under Article 227 applies only to landlord-tenant disputes under the Rent Control Act, 1999.

28 Oct 2010

The appellant, Ramchandra Krushnarao Pitale, an 87-year-old pensioner, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.6.2009 pa...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)