Search Results for "Naval Air Station"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Naval Air Station"

53 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Endorsement and Defence Ministry Letter Restricting Construction Near Defence Establishment — Executive Guidelines Cannot Override Statutory Rights Under Article 300A and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court held that the Works of Defence Act, 1903 occupies the field and any restrictions must be imposed under its provisions, not through executive guidelines.

29 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd. and Merushikhar Infra LLP, owned property in Bangalore. They sought to construct a building and obtained a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Official Secrets Act for Taking Photo of Complaint at Police Station. Petitioner's act of photographing a complaint filed against him does not constitute spying or disclosing secret information under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

28 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute Under Arbitration Act, 1940. The Court held that judicial interference in arbitral awards is limited to grounds of error on the face of the award or misconduct, and the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re-appreciating evidence on extension of time, termination validity, and idle hire charges.

18 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a construction contract dated 16th November 1988 between a construction company (appellant-claimant) and the Union of India (re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project in Colaba, Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Defence Authority's Letter. NOC from Defence Authorities Not Required for Completion of Construction Under DCR 1991 as Height Restriction Under Works of Defence Act, 1903 Not Applicable to Building Height Below 30 Meters.

27 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment under the Development Control Regulations of 1991 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Monitoring Committee's Order in Mukesh Mills Redevelopment Case — CRZ-II Zoning and Development Control Regulations Apply to Textile Mill Land.

21 Oct 2013

The petitioners, M/s TCI Industries Ltd and its Executive Director, owned a large property in Colaba, Mumbai, known as Mukesh Mills, a former cotton t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Breach of Trust Charges Against Directors in PF Default Case — Mere Delay in Depositing Provident Fund Amount Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC. Explanation 1 to Section 405 IPC Requires Dishonest Misappropriation or Conversion, Not Mere Retention or Delay.

8 May 2012

The petitioners, Noshir Adi Soonawala, Ratan Naval Tata, Pratap Bhogilal, and Sudhir Thackersey, were original accused Nos.5, 7, 2, and 8 respectively...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Remand to Appellate Court in Rent Control Eviction Case — Right of Appeal Not Violated. Partial Eviction Requirement Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Must Be Considered by Appellate Court.

21 Sep 2011

The appellant, Ramesh Danchand Waswani, a tenant of premises owned by respondent Yusufbhai Mukhtar Amir Varawalla, faced eviction proceedings under th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Profession Tax on Defence Civilians — Amendment Excluding Them from Exemption Upheld as Constitutional. The court held that the classification between Armed Forces personnel and civilian employees under Section 27A(a) of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 is based on an intelligible differentia and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

7 Jul 2006

The petitioners, civilian employees working in the Defence Department of the Union of India, filed writ petitions challenging the action of the State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) and Doubtful Credibility of Police Witnesses. The court held that failure to comply with mandatory provisions of Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act, 1985, and unreliable police testimony led to acquittal of the appellant charged with possession of 2.2 kgs of charas.

24 Mar 2006

The appellant, B. Chandramohan, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psyc...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)