Search Results for "Mumbai attacks"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Arvind Ganpat Lavte (Accused No.1), Vijay @ Bapu Chimaji Bhutekar (Accused No.2), and Pandit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Appeal in NIA Case on Ground of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellant, in custody since 2018, granted bail as co-accused similarly situated were released and trial had not commenced, upholding right to speedy trial under Article 21.

The appellant, Mohammad Raisuddin, was arrested in connection with NIA Special Case No. 3/2018 for alleged offences under the Unlawful Activities (Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Resignation from PG Medical Seat Without Penalty — Voluntary Resignation Before Course Commencement Not Prohibited by Information Bulletin. Court Directs Acceptance of Resignation and Refund of Bond Amount Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Neil Jayant Shah, a MBBS graduate from Grant Medical College, Mumbai, secured All India Rank 11 in NEET-PG 2021. In the counsellin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer Order of Chief Engineer in MSETCL for Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy. Transfer of Employee Mid-Academic Year Without Considering Family Circumstances Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Departmental Transfer Guidelines.

The petitioner, Sanjay Tulshiram Shinde, a Chief Engineer with Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (MSETCL), challenged an office orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Contempt Action Against Judges for Alleged Judicial Misconduct. Court holds that judges cannot be prosecuted for acts done in judicial capacity and that contempt of court proceedings cannot be initiated against judges for their judicial orders.

The petitioners, Common Citizen of India (Common Man) through Rakesh Omprakash Agarwal and Peoples Rights Vigilance Organisation, filed a writ petitio...