High Court of Bombay Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Nashik to Pune for Wife's Convenience under Section 24 CPC. The court held that the convenience of the wife, a lady litigant, outweighs the husband's choice of forum, and the petition under Section 13(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, should be transferred to Pune.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant wife, Devika Dhiraj Patil, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of divorce proceedings initiated by her husband, Dhiraj Sunil Patil, from the Family Court at Nashik to the Family Court at Pune. The marriage was solemnized on 21st February 2019 at Nashik, and no children were born. Due to matrimonial discord, the wife left the matrimonial home on 29th October 2022 and was dropped by the husband at her parents' house in Pune, with an assurance to bring her back within a week. On 23rd February 2023, the husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, at Nashik without the wife's knowledge. The wife learned of the petition on 6th April 2023 when the husband's cousin brought her belongings. She issued a notice on 18th April 2023 alleging matrimonial wrongs and expressing willingness for mutual divorce with conditions. The husband replied on 6th May 2023. The wife, residing in Pune, argued that she cannot travel alone to Nashik for court proceedings as her father, the only male escort, is aged and has undergone eye surgery and requires another surgery. The court considered the settled law that the convenience of the wife, especially a lady litigant, is paramount in transfer matters. The husband opposed the transfer, claiming the wife had previously traveled to Nashik and that the distance is only 200 km. The court held that the balance of convenience is in favor of the wife, as she is a lady litigant residing with her parents in Pune, and her father's health issues prevent him from accompanying her. The court allowed the transfer, directing the Family Court at Nashik to transfer the divorce petition to the Family Court at Pune, and the Family Court at Pune to dispose of the petition expeditiously.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Convenience of Wife - The court considered the wife's application for transfer of divorce proceedings from Nashik to Pune, emphasizing the convenience of the wife as a lady litigant who cannot travel alone due to her father's health issues. Held that the balance of convenience is in favor of the wife, and the petition is allowed (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition filed by the husband at Nashik should be transferred to Pune for the convenience of the wife, who is a lady litigant residing with her parents in Pune.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application, directing the Family Court at Nashik to transfer the divorce petition (P.A. No. 131 of 2023) to the Family Court at Pune, and the Family Court at Pune to dispose of the petition expeditiously.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings
  • convenience of wife
  • lady litigant
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Section 13(i)(a) Hindu Marriage Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 84

Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 167 of 2023

2023-09-08

Abhay Ahuja

2023:BHC-AS:26371

Mr. H.P. Vyas a/w. Mr. Chandrashekhar Yadav for the Applicant, Ms. Varsha Pichaya a/w. Mr. Sachin Padaye for the Respondent

Devika Dhiraj Patil (Nee Devika Jayprakash Buttepatil)

Dhiraj Sunil Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for transfer of divorce proceedings from Family Court at Nashik to Family Court at Pune under Section 24 CPC.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of divorce petition filed by husband from Nashik to Pune for wife's convenience.

Filing Reason

Wife, residing in Pune with parents, cannot travel alone to Nashik for court proceedings due to her father's health issues and lack of male escort.

Issues

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from Nashik to Pune for the convenience of the wife.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant wife argued that she is a lady litigant residing in Pune, cannot travel alone to Nashik, and her father is aged with health issues, making it difficult to escort her. Respondent husband opposed transfer, stating wife had previously traveled to Nashik and distance is only 200 km, and that he would bear travel expenses.

Ratio Decidendi

In transfer matters under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the wife, especially a lady litigant, is a paramount consideration. The balance of convenience favors the wife when she resides in a different city and faces difficulties in traveling due to lack of escort and health issues of family members.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application filed by the applicant wife under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC) seeking transfer of the divorce proceedings filed by the respondent husband before the Family Court at Nashik to the Family Court at Pune. Learned counsel would submit that it is settled law that in matters of transfer under section 24 of the CPC, the convenience of the wife is of paramount consideration. Having heard the learned counsel and having perused the application, this Court is of the view that the balance of convenience is in favour of the applicant wife.

Procedural History

The wife filed an application under Section 24 CPC on an unspecified date. The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act on 23rd February 2023 at Nashik. The wife learned of the petition on 6th April 2023. After notice and reply, the wife filed the present transfer application. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 8th September 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(i)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part II IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. Single Blow on Head with Stick Causing Death After 11 Days - Knowledge of Likely Death Established, No Intention to Kill.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Fixed-Term Employees Challenging Termination Upon Expiry of Contract — No Right to Continue After Expiry of Fixed Term. Fixed-term contractual employees have no vested right to continue beyond the contra...