Search Results for "Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961"

102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

1 Dec 2023

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Panchayat Raj Act Case — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9A(2) Notice Requirements. The court held that the notice period of seven clear days must exclude the date of service and the date of meeting, and failure to provide such notice renders the no-confidence motion void.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Shridhar Matkar, was the Sarpanch of Khirdi Village Panchayat. A notice of no-confidence motion was issued against him und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Disqualification Order Against Zilla Parishad Member Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. The court held that disqualification under Section 16(1)(i) requires direct evidence of interest in work done by Zilla Parishad order, not mere inference of misuse, and procedural fairness under Section 40 was violated.

17 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from the disqualification of a Zilla Parishad member elected on 08.01.2020, following a petition by a defeated candidate under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Divisional Commissioner Has No Jurisdiction Under Section 267A of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 to Set Aside Appointment of Anganwadi Sevika Made Under Integrated Child Development Scheme. The Commissioner's power under Section 267A is limited to appointments made under the Act and Rules, not to appointments under a Central Government Scheme like ICDS.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Sangita Ulhas Gadilkar, was appointed as an Anganwadi Sevika under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) by the Child Develop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Retirement Age of 60 Years Under MP Act - Petitioner Entitled to Superannuation at 60 Years as Per Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Vinayak Jankiram Ingle, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 05.08.1963/16.08.1963 by the Chief Executive Officer, Buldana, and wo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Unauthorised Parallel Cattle Bazar; Directs District Magistrate to Invoke Preventive Provisions of CrPC. Unlicensed Weekly Market Held in Contravention of Section 205, Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, and CEO Lacked Power to Prohibit, Hence District Magistrate Must Act Under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, After Considering Distance Rule Under Markets and Fairs Act, 1862.

28 Oct 2014

The writ petition arose from a dispute over a cattle bazar that had been operating for over 100 years at Walki village, Tq. Hadgaon, Nanded district. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Municipal Councillor for Defying Party Whip Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986. The Court held that the Petitioner's act of voting against the party whip constituted defiance, warranting disqualification under Section 3(1)(b) of the Act.

18 Jul 2014

The Petitioner, Mrs. Sulabha Vijay Lokhande, was a Municipal Councillor in Panchgani Municipal Council, elected as an independent candidate in Decembe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Vires of Explanation to Rule 3 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and Rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 — Explanation Held Valid. The Explanation does not travel beyond Section 12 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 and is constitutionally valid.

8 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Mrs. Shailaja Sunil Kolpe, filed a writ petition challenging the vires of the Explanation to Rule 3 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprentice Employees in Zilla Parishad — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of apprentices without inquiry or notice held illegal as they were 'workmen' under the Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by 21 individuals who were engaged as apprentices by the Zilla Parishad, Wardha, under the Appre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra State Veterinary Council Challenging Government Resolution on Qualifications for Veterinary Officers. The Court Held That the Council Lacks Authority to Regulate Employment Conditions Under the Maharashtra Veterinary Practitioners Act, 1971.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Veterinary Council, filed a writ petition challenging a Government Resolution dated 30th March 2007 issued by the St...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)