Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Upholding Plaintiff's Title Over Wakf Property. The court held that the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide the suit and that the plaintiff's suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a dispute over Survey Gut No.66 of village Harsool, Aurangabad. The plaintiff, Pratapsingh s/o Nursing Kakarwal, filed a suit before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside SDO's Possession Order Under Section 120(c) of MTAL Act — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Revision Beyond Limitation and Allowing Amendment Without Notice.

The petitioner, a Public Trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, owned agricultural land survey 209 admeasuring 35 acres at mouza Umarkhed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Eviction Suit by Trust — Notice of Termination Held Invalid for Non-Compliance with Section 36(2) of Bombay Tenancy Act. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Under Section 38 of the Act Not Extinguished Due to Invalid Notice.

The respondent, Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, owned agricultural land measuring 28 acre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Decree for Possession of Waqf Property. Defendants' claim of adverse possession fails as Waqf property is not subject to adverse possession under Section 107 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (petitioners) against the decree passed by the Maharashtra Waqf Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Purchaser of Tenanted Agricultural Land Against Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry. Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Purchaser Cannot Claim Rights Without Adjudication Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The appellant, M/s. S. Kumar Developers and Builders, purchased agricultural land that was tenanted. The appellant obtained mutation entries in the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Did Not Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal representatives of Balaji Ramaiya Manthanwar (appellants) and G...