Search Results for "Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal"

1109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Auction Sale: Statutory Violations Render Sale Null and Void. Despite recognizing significant procedural breaches, the Supreme Court offers the appellant a chance to retain the industrial property by settling liabilities.

The legality of an auction sale conducted by the Tahsildar and confirmed by the Additional Collector, which was later contested on the grounds of stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order on Tenancy Fixation. Tenancy Dispute Involving Mahar Watan Lands and Deemed Purchaser Status under Section 32-G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petition arose from a tenancy dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning agricultural lands in Dehugaon, Taluka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitral Tribunal Mandate for Unreasonable Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Condonation of delay set aside as claimant failed to show sufficient cause for 7-month delay.

The petitioner, Wanbury Ltd., filed a petition under sections 14(1)(a), 14(2), and 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...