Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"

550 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 550 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Challenge to Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Election-Linked Transfers of Police Personnel. Transfers Under Section 22-N of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Pursuant to ECI Directives Are Valid and Not Perishable, No Deemed Deputation.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Home Department, filed a batch of writ petitions challenging a common judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Impersonation and Cheating Case — Accused Posing as Police Officer Defrauded Informant of Rs. 1,50,000 for False Promise of Police Constable Job.

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Vilas Narayan Ganvir challenging his conviction and sentence under Sections 171, 419 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim for Alleged Illegal Detention by Police Officers. False Case Under Bombay Police Act Resulted in Discharge, but Court Found No Malafide Intent or Violation of Fundamental Rights.

The petitioner, Miss Veena Sippy, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, alleging...