Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Maharashtra Act XI of 2003 Amending the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That the Amendment Disenfranchising Certain Elected Members of Market Committees Was Within Legislative Competence and Did Not Violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(c) of the Constitution.

13 Feb 2006

The Bombay High Court, by a common judgment, dismissed two writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Act XI of 2003, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Deemed License Under Section 7(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Quashes Seizure Notice for Failure to Consider Application Within 30 Days. The Court held that the petitioner is deemed to have secured a license when the Market Committee failed to decide the application within 30 days, and the seizure notice was illegal.

27 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Shree Shyambaba Cotton Company, through its proprietor Anil Vallabhdas Kakani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

26 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Britannia Industries Ltd. Against Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Regarding Applicability of APMC Act to Processed Products. Court Holds That Sugar, Edible Oil, and Vanaspati Are 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, and Market Fees Can Only Be Levied on Transactions Within the Market Area.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Britannia Industries Ltd. challenging the applicability of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows APMC's Petition Against Village Panchayats' Levy of Market Cess. Exclusive Jurisdiction of APMC Under Section 4 of APMC Act Prevents Dual Levy by Village Panchayats Under Section 126 of Village Panchayats Act.

6 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Islampur, filed a writ petition challenging the action of respondent village panchayats ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Third Extension of APMC Board in Solapur — Holds Successive Extensions Without Election Unlawful Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The court directed the Collector to hold elections within four months, failing which an Administrator must be appointed.

15 May 2012

The petitioners, claiming to be members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Karmala, challenged an order dated 19 April 2012 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Cotton Federation in Market Fees Dispute — State Procurement Agency Held Liable to Pay Market and Supervision Fees Under APMC Act. The Court ruled that the appellant, acting as a government agent for cotton procurement, is a 'trader' under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and must pay fees on purchases from the market area.

11 Jan 2018

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Divisional Manager and Sub Divisional Manager of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Cotton Grow...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)