Bombay High Court Allows APMC's Petition Against Village Panchayats' Levy of Market Cess. Exclusive Jurisdiction of APMC Under Section 4 of APMC Act Prevents Dual Levy by Village Panchayats Under Section 126 of Village Panchayats Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Islampur, filed a writ petition challenging the action of respondent village panchayats (Mangale, Shirala, and Charan) in collecting cess or market fee from persons marketing agricultural produce within their respective villages. The villages were covered by a notification issued under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 (APMC Act), which declared them as part of the regulated market area. The village panchayats justified their levy under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, arguing that since the APMC was not actually carrying out any marketing activities in those villages, they were entitled to collect the cess. The court examined the provisions of Section 4 and Section 31 of the APMC Act. Section 4 empowers the government to issue a notification declaring regulation of marketing of specified agricultural produce in a specified market area, and after such notification, no other authority can levy any fee or cess in that area. Section 31 vests the APMC with the exclusive power to collect market fees. The court held that once a notification under Section 4 is issued, the APMC has the exclusive right to regulate marketing and collect fees, and village panchayats cannot levy any cess under Section 126 of the Village Panchayats Act. The court allowed the petition, quashing the action of the village panchayats in collecting cess or market fee.

Headnote

A) Agricultural Marketing - Exclusive Jurisdiction - Notification under Section 4 of APMC Act - Once a notification is issued under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 declaring a market area, no other authority including village panchayats can levy any cess or fee in respect of marketing of agricultural produce within that area. The APMC has the exclusive right to regulate marketing and collect fees. (Paras 4-5)

B) Village Panchayats - Levy of Cess - Section 126 of Village Panchayats Act - Section 126 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act cannot be invoked to levy cess or market fee in areas already covered by a notification under Section 4 of the APMC Act. The provisions of the APMC Act override the general powers of village panchayats. (Paras 5-6)

C) Interpretation of Statutes - Special Act Overrides General Act - The Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 being a special enactment dealing with regulation of marketing of agricultural produce, its provisions prevail over the general provisions of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether village panchayats can levy and collect cess or market fee under Section 126 of the Village Panchayats Act in areas already notified under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the action of respondent village panchayats in collecting cess or market fee from persons marketing agricultural produce within the villages covered by the notification under Section 4 of the APMC Act.

Law Points

  • Exclusive jurisdiction of APMC over notified market areas
  • prohibition on dual levy by village panchayats
  • interpretation of Section 4 and Section 31 of APMC Act vis-à-vis Section 126 of Village Panchayats Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (02) 6

Writ Petition No.2771 of 2001

2006-02-06

V.G. Palshikar, Ag.C.J., Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.

Mr. Vijay Patil for Petitioner, Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 4

Agricultural Produce Market Samiti, Islampur

State of Maharashtra, Director of Marketing, Collector of Sangli, Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Sangli, Gram Panchayat Mangale, Grampanchayat Shirala, Grampanchayat Charan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the levy and collection of cess or market fee by village panchayats in areas notified under the APMC Act.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner APMC sought quashing of the action of respondent village panchayats in collecting cess or market fee from persons marketing agricultural produce within the villages.

Filing Reason

The village panchayats were collecting cess or market fee under Section 126 of the Village Panchayats Act despite the area being notified under Section 4 of the APMC Act, which vests exclusive jurisdiction in the APMC.

Issues

Whether village panchayats can levy cess or market fee under Section 126 of the Village Panchayats Act in areas notified under Section 4 of the APMC Act. Whether the APMC has exclusive jurisdiction to regulate marketing and collect fees in notified market areas.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that once a notification under Section 4 of the APMC Act is issued, no other authority can levy any fee or cess in the notified area. Respondent village panchayats contended that since the APMC was not actually carrying out marketing activities in those villages, they were entitled to levy cess under Section 126 of the Village Panchayats Act.

Ratio Decidendi

Once a notification under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is issued declaring a market area, the APMC has the exclusive right to regulate marketing and collect fees, and no other authority including village panchayats can levy any cess or fee under Section 126 of the Village Panchayats Act in that area.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 4 of the Act specifically provides for a notification regarding the declaration of regulation of marketing of any specified agricultural produce in a specified market area. The wordings of section 4(1) clearly point out that after the issuance of notification under section 4 nobody else that is no other authority would be entitled to levy any fee or cess in respect of marketing of agricultural produce in that area.

Procedural History

The petitioner APMC filed Writ Petition No.2771 of 2001 before the Bombay High Court challenging the levy of cess by village panchayats. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on February 6, 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963: Section 4, Section 31
  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act: Section 126
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows APMC's Petition Against Village Panchayats' Levy of Market Cess. Exclusive Jurisdiction of APMC Under Section 4 of APMC Act Prevents Dual Levy by Village Panchayats Under Section 126 of Village Panchayats Act.
Related Judgement
High Court Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.