Search Results for "Maharashtra APMC"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Administrator for APMC Ghatanji Due to Expiry of Managing Committee's Term. Postponement of Elections Does Not Imply Extension of Tenure Under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, seven individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeal Challenging Single Judge Order on RTI Act Applicability to APMC. The appeal raises the question whether Agricultural Produce Market Committee is a public authority under Section 2(h) RTI Act.

Background: The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Arvi, challenging an order of the State I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Grampanchayats to Participate in APMC Elections as Nominees of Local Authorities Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Grampanchayat Held to Be a Local Authority Entitled to Nominate Members to APMC Under Section 11 of the Act.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats (village councils) in Maharashtra challenging the rejection of their nomination form...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Third Extension of APMC Board in Solapur — Holds Successive Extensions Without Election Unlawful Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The court directed the Collector to hold elections within four months, failing which an Administrator must be appointed.

The petitioners, claiming to be members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Karmala, challenged an order dated 19 April 2012 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Challenge to Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963 – Issue of Prior Consultation Mandate Under Section 45(1) Raised.

The case involved a challenge to the order dated 24.12.2013 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Yavatmal, under Section 45...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Vice-Chairman of APMC Challenging Removal Under Section 45(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Show Cause Notice and Removal Order Quashed for Being Vague and Non-Speaking, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, an elected Director and Vice-Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Dhamangaon Railway, challenged an order date...