Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

546 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging CIDCO Plot Allotments — Allegations of Fictitious Societies Grabbing Plots at Fixed Rates. The validity of allocations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and CIDCO Regulations depends on the genuineness of the housing societies.

23 Nov 2005

The Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Public Concern for Governance Trust, a registered charitable trust, against the State of Maharashtra,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation of Land for Garden and Playground Under MRTP Act — Failure to Commence Acquisition Within 10 Years Renders Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127. The court held that the lapse under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 occurs automatically upon expiry of 10 years from the date of the plan coming into force, regardless of whether a notice under Section 126 was served.

9 Jan 2015

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of lands described in paragraph 3 of the petition, challenged the reservation of their lands for a garden and p...

High Court

Writ Petition Dismissed on Land Development Rights. A dispute over land acquired for a public bus depot leads to rejection of development claims by private landowners, with the court emphasizing public interest over private rights.

27 Sep 2024

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) along with other respondents, the Bombay High Court dismissed the petition. The Petitione...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction of Disputed Development Control Regulations in PIL Challenging Unauthorized Insertion by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. Unauthorized Insertion of Regulations 16.4.12 and 16.4.13 Without General Body Approval Violates Section 37 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 and Vitiates State Government's Approval.

9 Sep 2014

The case originated from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur challenging the legality of the insertion of two regulatio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Petitioners Challenging Modifications to Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 Under Section 37 of MRTP Act. Petitioners Allege Amendments Are Not Minor, Ultra Vires, and Violate Right to Clean Environment Under Article 21.

21 Nov 2006

Seven petitioners, all tax payers and rate-payers of the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, filed a writ petition u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions on Withdrawal of Land Acquisition and Lapsing of Reservation under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Court considered whether the reservation for a secondary school on CTS No.398, Tardeo, lapsed due to alleged non-compliance with acquisition timelines and the validity of the State Government's withdrawal of acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jul 2015

The dispute concerned land bearing CTS No.398, admeasuring about 2339 sq. meters situated at Tardeo, Mumbai, reserved for a Secondary School in the sa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

20 Sep 2022

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period. Purchase Notice Served Under Section 127(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Not Followed by Acquisition Within Two Years, Resulting in Deemed Lapsing of Reservation.

27 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Shree Vinayak Builders & Developers, owned land admeasuring 6377.12 Sq.Mts. in Nagpur, which was reserved for a 24-meter wide DP Road ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)