Search Results for "MMRD Act 1957"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MMRD Act 1957"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Application, Discharges Applicant in Illegal Mining Case Due to Lack of Valid Authorization for Cognizance Under MMDR Act. The court held that in the absence of valid authorization, the Special Judge could not take cognizance of offences under Sections 4, 12, 22, 23 of MMDR Act, 1957, and Rules 3, 21 of GMPIMTS Rules, 2017, but the trial for IPC offences under Section 379/114 IPC may continue.

24 Feb 2026

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Harendra Chamnlal Mehta challenging an order dated 27.02.2024 passed by the learned Special...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Director of Mines and Geology in Royalty Dispute — State Can Charge Higher Royalty Due to Change in Law Despite Tender Agreement. The Court held that a subsequent amendment to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 increasing royalty rates applies to existing contracts unless expressly excluded.

1 Jan 2026

The Director of Mines and Geology, Karnataka, appealed against the High Court of Karnataka's order allowing the writ petition of M/s BMM Ispat Ltd. Th...

High Court

High Court Quashes Central Government Order Requiring Mining Company to Stop Operations and Obtain Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Mining Lease Renewal Not Requiring Fresh Approval Under Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as Lease Area Was Already Diverted for Non-Forest Use.

29 Apr 2025

The petitioner, The Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Limited, a mining company, challenged a communication dated 29 January 2014 issued by the Ministry ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.

17 Feb 2025

The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sand Mining Under MMRD Act — Revision Petition Dismissed. Petitioner failed to prove ownership of land or valid license for sand extraction, and courts below correctly applied Section 4(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rules 3(1) and 42 of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Parappa S/o Hamappa Lamani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shiggaon, in C.C.No.497/2013 for the offence punishable under S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Mining Lease Dispute to High Court for Fresh Adjudication on Substantial Questions of Law. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Immune from Challenge in Second Appeal if Based on No Evidence or Misreading of Evidence.

14 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard three civil appeals filed by the State of Rajasthan and its authorities against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in MMRD Act and IPC Case — Custodial Investigation Not Required. Offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC do not necessitate custodial interrogation; anticipatory bail granted with conditions.

8 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Iranna S/o Mallappa Baliger, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking antici...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)