High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in MMRD Act and IPC Case — Custodial Investigation Not Required. Offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC do not necessitate custodial interrogation; anticipatory bail granted with conditions.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Iranna S/o Mallappa Baliger, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.118/2016 registered with Naregal Police Station, Ron Taluka, Gadag District, for offences punishable under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 (MMRD Act) read with Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The complainant was the Sub-Inspector of Police, Manjula B. Sadariyavar. The court observed that the petitioner was not required for custodial investigation and that the offences alleged were not exclusively investigated by the police. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition and directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to conditions including executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety, appearing before the investigating officer as required, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the jurisdiction without permission.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 CrPC - Offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC - The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in Crime No.118/2016 registered by Naregal Police for offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC. The court held that the petitioner is not required for custodial investigation and granted anticipatory bail with conditions. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. In the event of arrest of the petitioner in Crime No.118/2016 of Naregal Police Station, the respondent is directed to release him on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with one surety for the likesum, subject to conditions: (i) petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer as and when required; (ii) petitioner shall not tamper with prosecution evidence; (iii) petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the court without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • MMRD Act
  • Section 21 MMRD Act
  • Section 379 IPC
  • custodial investigation not required
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (12) 24

CRL.P.NO.101410/2016

2016-12-08

S.N. Satyanarayana

Rajashekhar B Halli (for petitioner), Praveen K. Uppar (HCGP for respondent)

Iranna S/o Mallappa Baliger

State of Karnataka, represented by State Public Prosecutor, through Naregal Police Station

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to release him on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.118/2016.

Filing Reason

Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner is not required for custodial investigation. Respondent's counsel (HCGP) opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner is not required for custodial investigation; hence, anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The accused in Crime No.118/2016, registered with Naregal Police, for the offence punishable under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 read with section 379 of IPC, has come up in this petition seeking anticipatory bail. Admittedly in this proceedings the complainant is none other than the Sub-Inspector of Police by name Manjula B. Sadariyavar, who was the Police Sub-Inspector of Naregal Police Station.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 438 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.118/2016 registered by Naregal Police Station for offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 08-12-2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 438
  • Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 (MMRD Act): 21
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 379
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in MMRD Act and IPC Case — Custodial Investigation Not Required. Offences under Section 21 of MMRD Act, 1957 and Section 379 IPC do not necessitate custodial interrogation; anticipatory ba...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Chancellor's Cancellation of Nomination to Board of Examinations — Teacher of Affiliated College Not Eligible Under Section 31(3)(f) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. The Court held that 'teache...