Search Results for "MERC Regulations 2014"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "MERC Regulations 2014"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Promotion to Director (Legal) Post in Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission — Petitioner Not Entitled to Automatic Promotion Despite Holding Additional Charge.

11 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Anilkumar S/o Rupchand Ukey, was the Deputy Director (Legal) of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (the Commission) sin...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Order Restricting Electricity Bill to 24 Months in Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Head Master, Anudanit Prathamik Ashram Shala. The Court held that Regulation 6.4 of the MERC Regulations 2006 limits billing to 24 months prior to issuance, and the Forum's order was not perverse.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, challenged an order dated 08.06.2016 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petition Against CGRF Order in Electricity Connection Cost Refund Dispute. Distribution Licensee Not Obligated to Refund Infrastructure Costs for Dedicated Distribution Transformer Under Electricity Act, 2003.

22 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), a Distribution Licensee under the Electricity Act, 2003, filed thre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Distribution Licensee's Right to Levy Wheeling Charges on 110 kV Feeders — 110 kV HPCL Feeders Held Integral Part of Distribution Network Despite Voltage Level. The Court held that the functional use of the feeders for distribution to a single consumer, HPCL, determines their classification as distribution assets, not merely the voltage level under CEA Regulations, 2010.

3 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between Sai Wardha Power Generation Limited (SWPGL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) on one side, and Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Electricity Bill Based on Contract Demand Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Consumer Liable for Minimum Charges Even Without Actual Consumption. The court held that the consumer cannot unilaterally reduce contract demand and must pay minimum charges as per tariff, and Section 126 assessment for unauthorized use is not applicable when billing is based on contract demand.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Vinay Tilokchand Karnavat, a medical practitioner running a hospital in Sillod, Aurangabad, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary Employee in Service Law Case — No Automatic Confirmation After Probation Period Expiry Without Extension Order. The court held that a probationer continues to be on probation until a specific order of confirmation is passed, and termination under Regulation 21 of the MERC (Recruitment and Conditions of Services of Employees) Regulation, 2007 is valid without disciplinary enquiry.

26 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Dhrubajit Amiya Kumar Ghosh, was appointed as Deputy Director (Legal) with the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MERC Regulation on Gross Station Heat Rate. Regulation 44.2(d) of the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Multi Year Tariff) Regulations, 2011 prescribing Gross Station Heat Rate norm for thermal generation stations is held valid and within the Commission's powers under the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Apr 2016

The petitioners, Reliance Infrastructure Limited and its Deputy General Manager (Legal), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Section 34 Petition Against Foreign Award; Preliminary Objection Raised Pending Determination. Arbitration Agreement Existence and Enforcement of Foreign Award Under Part II Also Examined.

8 Apr 2015

The dispute arose from a voyage charter party dated 13 September 2008 between Aurelia Reederei Eugen Friederich GmbH Schiffahrtsgesellschaft & Company...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)