Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1830 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1830 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Condonation Delay in Himachal Pradesh VAT Act — Section 5 Limitation Act Applicable. High Court's revisional power under Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 includes power to condone delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 as Section 29(2) applies unless expressly excluded.

25 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Himachal Pradesh High Court's judgment dated 19.11.2018, which refused to condone delay in filing rev...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Accused's Challenge to Delay Condonation in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Customs Act. High Court's Authority to Condonate Delay Upheld as Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies to Appeals Under Section 378 CrPC Unless Expressly Excluded.

20 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from an appeal against acquittal filed by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion of 467 Days Under Section 14 of Limitation Act for Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Union of India failed to demonstrate due diligence.

24 Apr 2017

The petitioner, M/s DDL Excavation Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, Union of India (UOI), entered into an agreement for execution of works in Goa. Dispu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Frames Preliminary Issue of Limitation in Partition Suit Over Property Bequeathed by Will. Plaintiffs Claim Share in Villa Bemvinda and Challenge Development Agreement After Probate Was Granted and Revocation Petition Dismissed.

2 May 2019

The dispute arose over Villa Bemvinda, a property in Bandra, Mumbai, originally owned by Andrew D'Cunha. He executed a will on 20.2.1971 bequeathing t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Revision Applications as Time-Barred Under MRTU & PULP Act. Limitation for Revision under Section 44 is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

23 Sep 2022

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers between 1979 and 1991. T...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revision Applications by Original Defendants Seeking Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Limitation Held a Mixed Question of Law and Fact Requiring Trial; Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action Based on Discovery of Will in 2013, Suit Not Barred at Threshold.

8 Dec 2025

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance and cancellation of documents concerning a large tract of land in Kothrud, Pune. The plaintiff,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Dec 2014

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Interest on Delayed Payments Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Payment under Section 19 of Limitation Act, 1963 requires pleading and proof; Section 14 exclusion not available for different entity.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed three review petitions filed against its common judgment dated 23.01.2019, which had dismissed civil appeals by M/s Shanti...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)