Search Results for "Landowner ownership"

178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal for Re-Conveyance of Unutilised Acquired Land. Acquired Land Vests Absolutely in Government; Compensation and Lapse of Time Preclude Re-Conveyance Claim Under Land Acquisition Act.

The case arose from a writ petition filed by the appellants, who were successors of original landowners, seeking a direction to the respondents to con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal, Holds Section 84 Not an Alternative to Section 29(1) in Bombay Tenancy Act. Court Rules Invalid Surrender Does Not Entitle Tenant to Summary Eviction Under Section 84, Remedy Lies with Mamlatdar Under Section 29(1).

The dispute arose under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Respondent 1, the landowner, owned two survey numbers in Panchmahals, Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.

The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...