Search Results for "KUDA Act"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Writ Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court held that the acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 were valid and the petitioner failed to establish contempt.

The case involves a contempt petition (CCC No. 655/2023) filed by Chamundeshwari Nagara Sarvodaya Sangha against Sri Dinesh Kumar, Commissioner of Mys...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Land Owners’ Appeal, Remands Land Acquisition Reference for Fresh Consideration. Settlement Validity Must Be Examined Under KUDA Act and CPC, Prior Government Approval Necessary for Consent Award.

The appellants were owners of lands bearing Survey Nos.304/2A and 304/2B, measuring 11 acres 24 guntas, situated at Mahalbagayat, Vijayapura. The land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice and Relinquishment Deed Obtained by Coercion in Road Widening Case; Urban Development Authorities Cannot Demand Free Land Surrender Without Statutory Authorization under Section 32(5) of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987.

The petitioners, private citizens owning land in Shivamogga, challenged a demand by urban authorities to surrender 109.80 square metres of their land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to BDA Scheme Non-Lapse and Government's Withdrawal Notification. Scheme Under BDA Act Does Not Lapse Automatically Under Section 27; Government's Power to Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld.

The petitioner, Sri H. Krishna Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the 'By...