Search Results for "KIADB"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Special Audit Orders Against KIADB Under Section 142(2A) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Orders Passed Without Application of Mind and Without Recording Satisfaction as Required by Law.

The petitioner, Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB), a statutory board constituted under the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged.

The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Requirement. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Setting Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, 22 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 20...