Search Results for "Joint Sub-Registrar"

78 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 78 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court's Order on Court-Fees Valuation in Suit for Registration under Section 77 of Registration Act. Suit for Enforcement of Statutory Obligation Not Susceptible of Monetary Valuation, Governed by Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court-fees Act, 1958, Not Section 6(xi).

The petitioners, as plaintiffs, filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Discharges Rule in Developer's Writ Petition as Infructuous After Subsequent Registration of Cooperative Society. Companion Petition by Flat Purchasers Challenging Declaration under Apartment Ownership Act Left Unresolved in Incomplete Text.

This judgment pertains to two companion writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. Writ Petition No. 571 of 1995 was filed by the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Society's Refusal to Grant Membership to Purchaser of Premises. Registered Sale Deed Holder Entitled to Membership Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Despite Developer's Objection.

The petitioners, Apna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Development Agreement Held Chargeable Under Article 5(ga) at 1% of Consideration, Not Market Value.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasun Developers, challenged orders of the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Pune, and the Deputy Inspector Gene...