Search Results for "Interlocutory application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Interlocutory application"

1253 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1253 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief for Possession of Flats. Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion in Denying Interim Measures Under Section 17 Upheld, as No Patent Illegality or Perversity Demonstrated in Orders Dated February 14, 2019 and December 15, 2022.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a Joint Development Agreement dated August 20, 2009, between the Owner (late Petitioners, represented by legal heirs) and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commercial Court Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Appointment of Arbitrator — Holds That Section 11(6) Application Under Arbitration Act Is Not Maintainable Before Commercial Court Without Prior Notice Under Section 21.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12.01.2021 passed by the Commercial Co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Stamp Duty Deficiency — Maintainability of Writ Under Article 227 Against Interlocutory Orders of Arbitral Tribunal. The court held that a writ petition under Article 227 is not maintainable against an interlocutory order of an Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Act provides a complete mechanism including challenge to the final award under Section 34.

19 Jun 2020

The petitioner, Smt. Tejavathamma, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in NI Act Case — Maintainability of Revision Against Interim Deposit Order Under Section 143-A NI Act Upheld. The court held that an order under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act directing deposit of a percentage of the cheque amount is an interlocutory order and revisable under Section 397 CrPC.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Hitendra Upadhyay, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against respondent Shankar Gaud. Duri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Oral Evidence in Temporary Injunction Proceedings Under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC. The Court has inherent jurisdiction to permit oral evidence for just and effective adjudication of interim injunction applications.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Babulal Onkardas Kabra, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondents, Nilesh, Shailesh, and Rakesh Pukhraj Rathod, in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18(1) Second Proviso — Debt Recovery Tribunal Failed to Consider Borrower's Application Before Issuing Recovery Certificate. The court held that the DRT must decide an application for waiver or reduction of the pre-deposit under Section 18(1) second proviso of the SARFAESI Act before entertaining the appeal or issuing a recovery certificate.

8 Oct 2013

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of secured creditors under the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Setting Aside Process in Forgery Case — Sanction Under Section 195 CrPC Required for Prosecution of Offences Under Sections 463, 465 IPC When Alleged Forgery Relates to Proceedings Before Revenue Authorities.

17 Oct 2011

The petitioner, Bhausaheb Shivaramji @ Francis Ignati Bodhak, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Predeposit Condition for Appeal Against Interlocutory Order Under SARFAESI Act. Section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Requires Deposit of 50% of Debt for Any Appeal Under Section 17, Including Interlocutory Orders, and Appellate Tribunal May Reduce to 25%.

16 Nov 2010

The petitioners, M/s Vinay Container Services Pvt. Ltd. and its guarantors, challenged an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Orders Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 20 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Petitioner's challenge to DRT's decision to hear main case after dismissing interlocutory applications fails as review remedy was exhausted and appeal remedy remains available.

12 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Gangaram Biseshwar Agrawal, was defendant No. 2 in three recovery suits filed by Canara Bank, Union Bank of India, and State Bank of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)