Search Results for "Indian Forest Act 1927"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Forest Department Transit Fee on Imported Timber. Imported timber from foreign country is not 'forest produce' under Maharashtra Forest Rules, 1970, and no transit fee can be levied for its transportation from port to customs CFS.

The petitioner, Omprakash Nagoja, a sole proprietor of O.P.M. International, imported timber from a foreign country. The timber arrived at Jawaharlal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Vesting of Land as Private Forest Under Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Defective Notice Under Section 35(3) and Notification Under Section 35(1) Render Vesting Invalid.

The petitioner, Rajmachi Rural Aid and Development Programme, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a writ petition challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Gum by Forest Officials — Transit Passes Valid and Seizure Without Authority Under Forest Act. Petitioner had valid contract and transit passes for gum collection; seizure at destination without proper authority held illegal.

The petitioner, Arjun Ratansing Jadhav, was the highest bidder in an auction for collection of gum from Chalisgaon forest area for the period 26.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Surety's Discharge Under Section 141 of Indian Contract Act When Creditor Parts with Security. Surety Discharged as State Lost Security by Allowing Removal of Forest Produce Without Full Payment, Extinguishing Subrogation Rights.

The dispute arose from a forest contract auction conducted by the Divisional Forest Officer, Hoshangabad Division, for the sale of felled trees. One J...