Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Favoring Forest Department Over Gaon Sabha Leases. Title to 162 Acres in Village Kasmandi Khurd Vests with Forest Department Based on Notifications Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and Indian Forest Act, 1927, Invalidating Subsequent Leases by Gaon Sabha.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from consolidation proceedings concerning land in Village Kasmandi Khurd, where the Forest Department and lessees claimed title. The appellant, Prabhagiya Van Adhikari Awadh Van Prabhag, challenged a High Court order that allowed a writ petition by the respondents, Arun Kumar Bhardwaj (dead) through LRs and others, setting aside an order by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. The Deputy Director had corrected revenue entries for Khasra Nos. 1576 and 1738 in favor of the Forest Department, rejecting rival claims. The core legal issues involved the interpretation of notifications under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the validity of leases granted by the Gaon Sabha. The appellant argued that under Section 4 of the Abolition Act, all estates, including forests, vested in the State, and a notification dated 11.10.1952 specified that 162 acres in the village shall not vest with the Gaon Samaj. Further, a notification under Section 4 of the Forest Act on 23.11.1955 declared the land as Protected Forest, with a proclamation under Section 6 on 28.04.1968, barring accrual of rights under Section 5. The respondents, as lessees, contended that the Gaon Sabha had put them into possession in 1966, asserting valid leases. The court analyzed the statutory provisions, noting that no order under Section 117 of the Abolition Act vested the land in the Gaon Sabha, and the Forest Act notifications established the Forest Department's title. The court reasoned that the High Court erred in disregarding these notifications and the bar on rights acquisition post-notification. The decision reversed the High Court's order, restoring the Deputy Director's correction in favor of the Forest Department, holding that the Gaon Sabha leases were invalid as the land had already vested in the State and was subject to forest reservation.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Zamindari Abolition - Vesting of Estates - U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, Sections 4, 117 - Notification dated 11.10.1952 under Section 4 declared that 162 acres in Village Kasmandi Khurd shall not vest with Gaon Samaj - Held that all rights, title, and interest of intermediaries, including forests, vested in the State under Section 4, and no general or special order under Section 117 vested the land in Gaon Sabha (Paras 3-6).

B) Forest Law - Reserved Forest - Notification and Proclamation - Indian Forest Act, 1927, Sections 4, 5, 6, 20 - Notification dated 23.11.1955 under Section 4 declared land as Protected Forest, followed by proclamation under Section 6 on 28.04.1968 - Held that after Section 4 notification, no rights could be acquired except as per Section 5, and the forest was deemed reserved under Section 20, overriding subsequent Gaon Sabha leases (Paras 7-9).

C) Consolidation Proceedings - Correction of Revenue Entries - U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Deputy Director of Consolidation ordered correction of Khasra Nos. 1576 and 1738 in name of Forest Department - High Court set aside this order, but Supreme Court reversed, holding that Forest Department's title based on notifications prevails, and Gaon Sabha leases were invalid (Paras 1-2, 10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation that corrected revenue entries in favor of the Forest Department, based on notifications under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and whether the leases granted by the Gaon Sabha were valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court order dated 30.11.2005, and restored the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 08.07.2004 correcting revenue entries in favor of Forest Department

Law Points

  • Vesting of estates under Section 4 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act
  • 1950
  • vesting of forests in Gaon Sabha under Section 117 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act
  • notification under Section 4 of Indian Forest Act
  • 1927
  • bar on accrual of rights under Section 5 of Indian Forest Act
  • proclamation under Section 6 of Indian Forest Act
  • final notification under Section 20 of Indian Forest Act
  • correction of revenue entries in consolidation proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 12

Civil Appeal No. 7017 of 2009

2021-10-05

Hemant Gupta, J.

Prabhagiya Van Adhikari Awadh Van Prabhag

Arun Kumar Bhardwaj (Dead) Thr. LRS. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal challenging High Court order in writ petition regarding correction of revenue entries in consolidation proceedings

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks reversal of High Court order and restoration of Deputy Director of Consolidation's order correcting entries in favor of Forest Department

Filing Reason

High Court allowed writ petition, setting aside order that corrected revenue entries in name of Forest Department

Previous Decisions

Deputy Director of Consolidation ordered correction in favor of Forest Department on 08.07.2004; High Court set aside this order on 30.11.2005

Issues

Whether the High Court erred in setting aside the Deputy Director of Consolidation's order correcting revenue entries in favor of the Forest Department Whether the notifications under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and Indian Forest Act, 1927 establish Forest Department's title over the land Whether the leases granted by Gaon Sabha are valid in light of the statutory notifications

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that under Section 4 of Abolition Act, all estates vested in State, and notification dated 11.10.1952 specified land shall not vest with Gaon Samaj Appellant argued that notification under Section 4 of Forest Act on 23.11.1955 and proclamation under Section 6 on 28.04.1968 barred accrual of rights, establishing Forest Department's title Respondents claimed valid leases from Gaon Sabha based on possession in 1966

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 4 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, all estates including forests vested in State, and notification dated 11.10.1952 specified land shall not vest with Gaon Samaj; no order under Section 117 vested land in Gaon Sabha. Notification under Section 4 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 on 23.11.1955 and proclamation under Section 6 on 28.04.1968 established Forest Department's title, barring accrual of rights under Section 5; thus, Gaon Sabha leases granted in 1966 are invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad on 30.11.2005 whereby the writ petition filed by the respondents 1 was allowed. The High Court vide the impugned order has set aside the order dated 08.07.2004 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Lucknow, wherein, the revenue entry of Khasra Nos. 1576 and 1738 was ordered to be corrected in the name of Department of Forest and the claim of rival claimants were set aside. A notification dated 11.10.1952 under Section 4 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 was published in U.P. Gazette dated 18.10.1952 to the effect that an area of 162 acres in Village Kasmandi Khurd shall not vest with the Gaon Samaj. It was on 23.11.1955, a notification was issued under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. After the said notification, a proclamation under Section 6 of the Forest Act was carried out on 28.04.1968. It appears that local management committee (Gaon Sabha) had put the lessees into possession of 7 bighas of land on 15.05.1966 and another 5 bighas of land on 26.12.1966 forming part of the land in dispute.

Procedural History

Deputy Director of Consolidation passed order on 08.07.2004 correcting revenue entries in favor of Forest Department; High Court set aside this order on 30.11.2005 in writ petition; Supreme Court heard civil appeal challenging High Court order.

Acts & Sections

  • U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950: 4, 117
  • Indian Forest Act, 1927: 4, 5, 6, 20
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Favoring Forest Department Over Gaon Sabha Leases. Title to 162 Acres in Village Kasmandi Khurd Vests with Forest Department Based on Notifications Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act,...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Reinstatement Order in Service Termination Case Due to Inordinate Delay of 11 Years. Claim Petition Under Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976 Dismissed as Challenge Was Raised After 11 Years ...