Search Results for "Housing Facilities"

446 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment for Lack of Quorum and Procedural Irregularities. Amendment to Bye-Law 24(c) restricting voting rights to one member per family set aside as resolution passed without requisite quorum and without proper notice.

The petitioners, Uday Dalal, Ajay Biyani, Rina Pritish Nandy, and Prachi Agarwal, are members of the Malboro House Coop. Housing Society Limited, a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Refusal to Admit Member Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Court upholds society's right to reject membership based on non-compliance with by-laws and lack of eligibility.

The petitioner, Dilip Bobde Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...