Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

436 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Up-Sarpanch Election Due to Absence of Notice. Court Holds That Presence and Participation of All Members Cures Any Defect in Notice Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

1 Feb 2019

The petitioners, who were members of Gram Panchayat Sukli, challenged the election of respondent no.6 as Up-Sarpanch. The election was held on 23.05.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch to Vote in UpaSarpanch Election - Collector's Refusal Set Aside. Sarpanch is a member of Gram Panchayat and entitled to vote in election of UpaSarpanch under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Kalpana Bapurao Thakare, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Nandgaon Chincholi. Elections for the post of UpaSarpanch were sche...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Election Notice for President of Gram Panchayat Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 3(1A) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Elections of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994 — Notice Issued Without Prior Publication of List of Members Entitled to Vote.

20 Feb 2014

The petitioners, members of Madiyanooru Gram Panchayat, challenged the election notice dated 7.2.2014 issued by the Prescribed Officer for the electio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Sarpanch Election Due to Procedural Violation. Election by show of hands after demand for secret ballot under Rule 10 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964 is void.

13 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Sau. Kalpana w/o Laxman Bhujbal, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Mategaon on 29.8.2010. During the meeting, after a majority...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch — Holds That Election Must Be Held Within the Term of the Panchayat as Per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court quashed the notice for election scheduled before the expiry of the existing Panchayat's term, ruling that such election would curtail the tenure of the existing body.

20 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Yogesh Pandharinath Dalvi and Sanjaykumar Dashrath Dubile, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the notice issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Gram Panchayat Election for Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. The court upheld the trial court's decision that the election of petitioners was invalid due to failure to rotate reserved seats as per Section 12 and 14 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 read with Rule 4 of the Bombay Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats and Rotation of Reserved Seats) Rules, 1964.

27 Aug 2015

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by Jagarao Raising Ade and Sau. Raubai Bhikaji Landge challenging the judgment of the Civil Judge, Junior D...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute — Upholds Single Judge Order Setting Aside Election of Appellant for Non-Compliance with Rule 4(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1996. The court held that the requirement to publish the list of contesting candidates is mandatory and non-compliance renders the election void.

11 Dec 2023

The appellant, Sharanappa S/o Lachamappa, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat of Ullesugur, Wadagera Taluk, Yadagiri District. The election ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Gram Panchayat Elections — Upholds Validity of Election Process Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court holds that election of members of Gram Panchayat cannot be challenged after declaration of results except by an election petition under Section 15 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA No.203 of 2011 and LPA No.204 of 2011) filed against the orders of a learned Single Judge of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process for Gram Panchayat. Court holds that election process once commenced cannot be interfered with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the remedy lies in election petition under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

28 Mar 2016

The petitioners, Sajid Majid Khan and Babarao Parashram Kandhare (in W.P. No. 3196/2016) and Shaikh Salim Shaikh Madar (in W.P. No. 3420/2016), filed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Challenging Election of Members of Gurupura Grama Panchayat — No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution of India in Election Disputes After Declaration of Results. The court held that once the election process is over and results are declared, the only remedy is an election petition under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and no interference under Article 226 is warranted.

6 Aug 2015

The case pertains to a dispute regarding the election of members of Gurupura Grama Panchayat in Mangaluru Taluk, Dakshina Kannada. The appellants, Smt...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)