Search Results for "Godrej & Boyce"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Godrej & Boyce"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Additional Amenity TDR in Garden Reservation Case — Municipal Corporation Cannot Deny TDR for Land Reserved for Garden on Grounds of Non-Construction of Road. Held that once land is reserved for a garden and developed as such, the owner is entitled to additional amenity TDR under DCR 33(9) read with Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966, irrespective of whether a road is constructed.

3 Apr 2024

The petitioners, Vijay Nagar Apartments (a partnership firm) and its partner Dhaval Ajmera, owned approximately 98,369.1 square meters of land in Vill...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developers' Challenge to PMC's Differential Development Charges Policy. Held that imposing higher development charges on properties within 100 meters of DP road while exempting others violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioners, a group of developers and a real estate association, challenged the policy of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) that imposed highe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

26 Jul 2023

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications and Awards for Failure to Conduct Social Impact Assessment and Public Hearing Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Sections 4, 11, and 19 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Renders Acquisition Void Ab Initio.

4 May 2023

The Petitioners, Manekbben Rama Tandel and Dharmesh Sukkar Tandel, are owners of land bearing survey Nos. 8, 10/1, 11/2, 11/3 of village Kathiria, Dam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge Against Arbitral Order Granting Opportunity to Cure Resolution Irregularity. Order held not an interim award under Section 2(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it does not finally determine any issue.

1 Nov 2022

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Petitioners (RA Group) challenging an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Mutation Entry in Private Forest Case — Government Failed to Prove Land Was Forest Under MPFA Act. Collector's Order Under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 Directing Deletion of Government's Name from Record of Rights Upheld as Mutation Entry Was Made Without Notice and Without Proper Inquiry.

11 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Sunil Shamrao Patil and Anupama Sunil Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging mutation entry No. 1736 d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Department's Notice on Private Forest Land. Held that lands restored under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 retain status of reserved forest under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

3 Feb 2015

The Petitioner, Sinhagad Technical Education Society, claimed ownership of lands bearing Gat Nos. 310 and 311 at village Kusgaon Budruk, Taluka Maval,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Additional DRCs in Road Construction Case — Mandamus Issued to MCGM to Issue DRCs for Balance 75% Area of Amenity Road Constructed and Taken Over. Petitioners entitled to DRCs for entire area under Development Control Regulations Appendix VII(6) based on Supreme Court precedent.

10 Jul 2014

The petitioners, Novartis India Limited, Oberoi Realty Limited, and Shri Vikas Oberoi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for 100% TDR in Road Construction Case — Municipal Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions Under MRTP Act and DCR. The court directed grant of 100% Transfer of Development Rights for construction of a D.P. Road, following the Supreme Court's decision in Godrej and Boyce.

22 Apr 2014

The petitioner, Natvar Parikh & Co. Pvt. Ltd., a company in the business of construction and development, filed a writ petition seeking direction to t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LIC's Reduction in Gratuity Fund Policy Surrender Value. LIC's decision to pay 92.5% of cash accumulation upheld as consistent with policy terms and not arbitrary.

29 Aug 2005

The petitioners, trustees of the Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Employees’ Gratuity Trust Fund, had taken out a group gratuity policy ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)