Search Results for "Fortuitous Promotions"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi and Delay. Petitioners, who were not eligible for promotion to Junior Engineer, cannot challenge promotions of others, and the challenge is barred by delay and laches.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by employees of the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation challenging the promotions of respondents 3 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Rejection of Appeal Regarding Promotion to Junior Clerk Post. Petitioner Cook Held Entitled to Promotion Over Peon Based on Higher Qualifications and Government Resolutions.

The petitioner, Ratan Parbat Ahire, was employed as a Cook at a school run by respondent No.1 management. He possessed qualifications of HSC, Typing i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Quota Between Degree and Diploma Holders. Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer is reasonable and not violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioners, K.K. Bhaskaran and Sarjeet Singh, were working as Junior Engineers in the Electrical Department of the Administration of Union Territ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute — Date of Appointment Prevails Over Year of Vacancy. Promotees appointed on 01.03.2007 are senior to direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 and 24.11.2007 under the Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965.

The case involves an inter-se seniority dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the Manipur Police Service Grade II Officers Cadre. The promo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Kotwals' Writ Petition Against Age Bar; Applies COVID-19 Relaxation GR to Group D Absorption. The Court Found That Government Resolution Dated 17.12.2021 Should Be Interpreted Liberally to Include All Kotwals Affected by Recruitment Delays, Ensuring No Anomalous Exclusion.

The petitioners, eleven Kotwals working on honorarium in Aurangabad district, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order ...