Search Results for "Employer Challenge"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Employer Challenge"

1444 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1444 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Failed to Disprove Employment Relationship and Negligence. Commissioner's award of compensation, penalty, interest, medical expenses, and costs under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 upheld.

5 Mar 2026

The present appeal was filed by the Chief Officer, Bhanvad Municipality, under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the ju...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

27 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Employees for Illegal Strike and Misconduct Without Enquiry — Justified Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's Right to Lead Evidence Before Labour Court to Justify Dismissal Without Enquiry Upheld When Atmosphere of Terror Prevents Disciplinary Proceedings.

22 Oct 2024

The case involves a writ petition filed by 22 ex-employees of M/s. Advani Oerlikon Ltd. challenging the judgment and order of the First Labour Court, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Labour Cess Demand Under Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Court held that the cess demand was invalid as the contract work did not constitute 'building or other construction work' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996, and the levy under Sections 3(1) and (2) of the Cess Act was not applicable.

12 May 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

15 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employer's Petition in VDA Dispute, Modifies Retrospective Effect to Date of Award. Industrial Tribunal's Award of Enhanced Variable Dearness Allowance Upheld but Retrospective Operation Limited to Date of Award Instead of Date of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

18 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Madura Coats Limited, an employer engaged in manufacturing yarns, industrial textiles, and clothes, challenged an award dated 22 March...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Failed to Prove Termination Was Not Retaliatory. Oral Termination Without Notice or Justification Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Items (a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

7 Aug 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Val Colour Arts and its proprietor Mr. Valentine D'mello (employer), challenged the judgments of the First Labour Court, Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Bonus Dispute Under Amended Section 12 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that denial of bonus based on Rs.3,500 salary limit constitutes an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

18 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Babasaheb Kedar Shetkari Sahakari Sut Girni, a cooperative spinning mill, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court, N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)