Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

449 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 449 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging PF Liability for Contract Workers. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Para 30 of EPF Scheme for Non-Compliance by Contractors.

11 Apr 2014

The petitioner, M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged an order dated 1.7.2013 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ne...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes EPF Orders Passed Without Proper Inquiry in Textile Processing Unit Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and lack of evidence.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s Dadu Processors (P) Ltd., a textile processing unit, challenged orders dated 29.12.2022 passed under Section 7A and 06.04.2023 pas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Criminal Revision Petitions in Employees' Provident Funds Act Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Employer-Employee Relationship. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove that the petitioner was the employer or responsible for compliance under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

23 Jul 2021

The case involves multiple criminal revision petitions filed by Sri D. Srinivasa Rao challenging his conviction and sentence under the Employees' Prov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in EPF Act Coverage Dispute — Expert Services Notification Interpreted Narrowly. Computer consultancy not covered under notification dated 17th May 1971 extending Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to establishments rendering expert services.

20 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., challenged the decision of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Appellate Tribunal that it...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Scheme Case — Employee Must Refund Employer's CPF Contribution to Avail Pension. Calcutta State Transport Corporation Employees' Service (Death cum Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990 require existing employees to exercise option within six months; employee who opted for pension but retained CPF amount cannot claim pension without refund.

5 May 2023

The case pertains to a dispute between the Calcutta State Transport Corporation and its former employee, Ashit Chakraborty, regarding entitlement to p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Educational Institutions' Challenge to Provident Fund Recovery — Upholds Applicability of EPF Act to Aided Schools and Colleges. Institutions Cannot Claim Exemption Under Section 16(1)(b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Once They Cease to Be Exempt Establishments.

27 Feb 2017

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by several educational institutions in Parbhani district, Maharashtra, challenging the applicabi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes EPF Tribunal Order for Non-Supply of Enquiry Report to Employer Under Section 7-A of the EPF Act. Violation of Natural Justice Principle Requiring Supply of Enquiry Report Before Determining Provident Fund Dues.

7 Aug 2012

The petitioner, a co-operative sugar factory, challenged the order of the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal which dismissed its appeal agai...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Employees Provident Fund Pension Fraud Case Due to Misrepresentation and Non-Disclosure. Petitioner's Failure to Disclose Earlier Pension in Form 10-D and Application for Early Pension While in Subsequent Employment Constituted Fraud Under Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and Employees Pension Scheme, 1995.

5 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition concerning allegations of pension fraud under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellane...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in EPF Act Case — Company Entitled to Infancy Period. Functional integrality not established between two companies despite common ownership; Section 16(1)(d) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 applies to newly set up establishment.

7 Jul 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur, challenging the order of the Employees' Provident Fund A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPF Authority to Auction Defaulting Employer's Property Despite Bank's Secured Interest Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of EPF Dues Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11(2) of EPF Act Upheld.

17 Dec 2025

The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund (Petitioner) filed a writ petition seeking auction of the property of Respondent No.2 (the emp...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)