Search Results for "Electricity Act, 2003"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Electricity Act, 2003"

907 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 907 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Electricity Procurement Dispute, Upholding High Court's Direction for Power Purchase from Successful Bidders. The Court affirmed that the Request for Proposal process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, is binding, and the reduction of procurement quantum from 1000 MW to 500 MW was invalid, requiring adherence to original bid outcomes.

8 Jan 2024

The dispute originated from Rajasthan's initiative to procure 1000 MW of electricity through a competitive bidding process under Section 63 of the Ele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

15 Mar 2022

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Electricity Distribution Company in Theft Case: Parallel Assessment Under Section 126 Permissible Despite Criminal Complaint Under Section 135. Assessment Under Section 126 Not Conditional on Consumer Seeking Restoration of Supply.

1 Aug 2019

The case involves an appeal by West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court which allowed t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Electricity Distribution Company Challenging Consumer Forum Order Setting Aside Supplementary Bills. Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Has Jurisdiction Under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003 to Adjudicate Disputes Regarding Defective Metering and Supplementary Bills.

18 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.03.2017 passed by the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Billing Dispute — Petitioner Agro Industry Challenged Retrospective Reclassification and Demand for Arrears Under HT-2(A) Tariff. Court Held That Reclassification Without Prior Notice and Retrospective Application of Tariff Was Unlawful and Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

7 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s Sri Balaji Agro Industries, is an agro-based industry located at Chicksugur Industrial Growth Center, Raichur. The respondent, GES...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds KERC Regulations on Renewable Purchase Obligation for Captive Users. Regulations Requiring Captive Power Producers to Purchase Renewable Energy or Certificates Are Within Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Apr 2014

The petitioners, The South Indian Sugar Mills Association and Davangere Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P.Nos.7603-04/2012) and Shree Renuka Sugar Mills...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Electricity Dues Dispute — Transferee Not Liable for Predecessor's Arrears Beyond Six Months Under MERC Regulations 2005. The court held that under Regulation 10.5 of the MERC (Electricity Supply Code and Other Conditions of Supply) Regulations, 2005, a transferee is liable only for six months of unpaid electricity charges, not the entire arrears.

16 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Namco Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Maharashtra St...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEB's Challenge to Sale of Captive Power to Third Party Without Licence Under Electricity Act, 2003. Captive Generating Plant Not Required to Obtain Licence for Sale to Another Industrial Consumer Under Section 9 Read With Section 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

4 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulator...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)