Search Results for "Easementary Rights"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Police Notice Under Section 149 CrPC Restraining Construction on Private Land Due to Alleged Dargah — Police Cannot Adjudicate Civil Rights or Property Disputes Under the Guise of Preventive Action.

The petitioner, M/s. Rai Udyog Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a notice dated 28.06.2021 issued by the State of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Village Panchayath Resolution and Taluk Panchayath Approval for Lack of Notice to Petitioner. Resolution passed without notice to the petitioner, who is the owner of the property, violates principles of natural justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sri Malledevirappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a resolution dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Easement Right of Way Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff failed to prove existence of easement by necessity or prescription over forest land under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Sri B.V. Srikumar, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration of right of way and permanent injunction against the Chief ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Nazul Plot to Ex-Serviceman Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Earlier Rejection. Collector's Order Set Aside as Petitioner's Easementary Rights Were Ignored and No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Ismailkhan, owned land adjacent to a Nazul plot in Chandrapur. In 1972, one Abdul Majid applied for allotment of the plot for hotel pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which confirmed the trial court...