Search Results for "Development Plan road"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Development Plan road"

1631 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1631 result(s)

High Court

High Court Examines Validity of Ahmedpur Development Plan Notification Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Core Issue Involves Mandatory or Directory Nature of Section 26(1) Timeline and Permissible Limits of Extension Under Third Proviso.

3 Aug 2026

The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners in Ahmedpur, District Latur, challenging a notification dated 29.03.2012 published on 08.05...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

5 Aug 2016

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Land Reserved for D.P. Road and Social Welfare Not Acquired Within Reasonable Time After Purchase Notice. The court held that re-reservation in a revised development plan cannot revive a lapsed reservation under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

21 Jan 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land bearing Gat No.87/1 at Mouza Digras, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the reservation of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for TDR in DP Road Development Case — Petitioner Entitled to TDR for Roads Developed and Paid For Under DCR 33(7) and 33(8). The court held that the Petitioner is entitled to Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the form of Floor Space Index (FSI) equivalent to the area of DP Roads developed and paid for by it, and quashed the rejection by the Respondents.

3 Jul 2020

The Petitioner, M/s Siddhi Real Estate Developers, is the owner of land admeasuring approximately 85,778 sq.mtrs. at village Dhokali, Thane. The Petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking TDR for Land Acquired Under MRTP Act — Transferable Development Rights Claim Barred by Limitation as Application Filed Beyond Reasonable Period After Possession. The court held that a claim for TDR under Section 126(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 must be made within a reasonable period, and a delay of seven years from the date of possession disentitles the claimant.

10 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Karan Developers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Pune Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Reservation for Transport Terminus Due to Lapse Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Acquisition Not Initiated Within Ten Years from Publication of Development Plan.

9 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Nandkishor s/o Babulal Agrawal, is the owner of land Survey No. 505/04 admeasuring 1.07 H.R situated at Dhule. Out of this land, 67 R ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considers writ petitions challenging lapsing of land reservations due to failure to complete acquisition within statutory period despite TDR offers. The core issue involves interpretation of 'steps towards acquisition' under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and whether a unilateral offer of Transferable Development Rights by the planning authority satisfies the requirement without a concluded agreement.

23 Dec 2021

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of four writ petitions concerning the lapse of land reservations under the Mah...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition Challenging Revival of Lapsed Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Reservation for playground deemed lapsed due to non-acquisition within statutory period cannot be revived by inclusion in final development plan.

13 Jul 2022

The petitioners, owners of land in Akola, challenged the inclusion of their land in the final development plan despite the reservation having lapsed u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Modification of Development Plan Under MRTP Act for Non-Compliance with Section 31(3) and Section 37. The court held that modification of land reservation from educational to residential is substantial and requires notice and hearing.

24 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Modern Education Society, Vita, a registered public trust engaged in educational activities, challenged a part of the notification dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Planning Authority Can Compel Landowner to Accept Transferable Development Rights Instead of Monetary Compensation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Division Bench Examines the Interplay of Sections 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Where a Landowner Served a Purchase Notice After Reservation Not Acquired Within Ten Years and the Planning Authority Offered TDR as Compensation.

16 Sep 2021

The petitioner, a landowner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that her land reserved in the Developme...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)