38 result(s) found
Distinction Between Conveyance and Development Agreement — Extensive Rights of Developer Held as Conveyance Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Subst...
Disobedience of an injunction order remains punishable even if the underlying suit is later dismissed (Samee Khan v. Bindu Khan). A lawyer’...
Binding Amendment Requires Consensus on Essential Terms: – For a binding amendment to a development agreement, the parties must reach consensus ad...
Court Upholds Removal of Committee Members Without Ownership of Flats in Society’s Building – Developer’s Dual Role Under Scrutiny The Court up...
The Bombay High Court dismissed a Chamber Summons filed under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the CPC by the Appellants seeking to produce additional evide...
In the case under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Bombay High Court addressed a challenge to an interim relief order pa...
The Bombay High Court (Coram: Amit Borkar, J.) addressed whether an executing court can interpret a decree to restrict interest on the decretal amount...
The Bombay High Court dealt with the challenge against the denial of deemed conveyance under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (...
The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by a developer against a cooperative ...
The Bombay High Court, through Justice Arif S. Doctor, dismissed an Interim Application (IA) by the Plaintiff, SR Enterprises. The IA sought to amend ...
