APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2015
1 Dec 2016These appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 31st March 2015 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two proceedings: Suit ...
Search Results for "Depository Participant"
38 result(s) found
Found 38 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Companies Act and SEBI Regulations Jurisdiction Dispute. The court held that rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is summary and not for contested facts, and SEBI has exclusive jurisdiction over violations of its regulations, not the National Company Law Tribunal.
4 Jan 2023The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal concerning the rectificatory jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 59 of the Comp...
- 262
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Guarantee and Pledge Against Company Pending Company Law Board Proceedings. Alleged Fraudulent Assumption of Liability by Directors Without Shareholder Consent Raises Serious Questions to be Tried.
15 Jul 2013The applicant, Rajinder Kumar Malhotra, filed an application in a pending company appeal seeking an interim injunction to restrain HDFC Bank from reco...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Interim Applications in Commercial Suit for Declaration and Injunction Against Bank's Auction of Secured Assets. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief as the bank's possession and auction of secured assets under SARFAESI Act were valid and not vitiated by any fraud or collusion.
5 Jun 2023The plaintiffs, Cheerful Trade and Realty Developers Pvt Ltd and Aristo Realty Developers Ltd, both non-banking financial companies, filed a commercia...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Application in SEBI Investigation Case — Applicant Failed to Show Prima Facie Case of No Offence Under SEBI Act and IPC. Court Held That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted Where Investigation Is at Nascent Stage and Applicant's Role in Alleged Fraudulent Scheme Requires Detailed Scrutiny.
11 Sep 2025The applicant, Rajiv Ranjan Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) in connecti...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Involving Share Buyback Under Letter of Undertaking. The appeal challenges the grant of interim injunction on grounds that the agreement is not a concluded contract and that its performance would breach MIMPS Regulations making it void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
11 Sep 2015The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arises from an order dated 13 October 2014 passed by a single judge granting interim inj...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Revoke Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act, 1866 in Commercial Suit for Loan Recovery. Execution of Assignment Deed in Mumbai Constitutes Part of Cause of Action, Sufficient to Maintain Suit.
4 Feb 2013The Plaintiff, PIL Industries Limited, a company registered in Mumbai, filed a suit against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (Defendant No.1) and others...
- 191
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance of Share Pledge Agreement. Court holds that a prima facie case for specific performance of a contract to create a pledge is made out when the contract is clear and the plaintiff has performed its obligations.
23 Jun 2022The appellant, World Crest Advisors LLP, filed a Commercial Suit against Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd and others seeking specific performance of a share p...
- 39
High Court
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Remand Order for Further Evidence Upheld. Court holds that appellate arbitral tribunal's directions for further evidence are within its powers and do not constitute a final determination of rights under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Dec 2014The case involves a dispute between ANS Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner), a registered stock broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange, and Mr. Jayesh R. Ajmera (resp...
- 122
