Search Results for "Debt Recovery Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Debt Recovery Tribunal"

518 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 518 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit Against Principal Borrower Despite Moratorium Against Guarantors Under IBC. The court permitted the plaintiff to proceed only against defendant no.1 (principal borrower) while reserving rights against guarantors under moratorium.

6 Apr 2026

The plaintiff, IL & FS Financial Services Limited, filed a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recover ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

19 Dec 2024

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

High Court

Delhi High Court Allows Arbitration Against Guarantors Despite Moratorium Under Section 96 of IBC — Moratorium Does Not Extend to Co-Guarantors Not Covered by NCLT Orders. The court held that the moratorium under Section 96 is debt-centric and personal to the debtor, and does not bar proceedings against other co-guarantors.

20 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a finance company, granted channel finance facility to Sterling Motor Company (SMC), a proprietorship of Tarun Kapoor. Tarun Kapoor, P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Winding Up Petition Despite DRT Decree — Recovery of Debts Act Does Not Bar Winding Up Proceedings Under Companies Act. Secured Creditor Need Not Relinquish Security Before Admission of Winding Up Petition; Election Arises Only After Winding Up Order Under Section 529 Companies Act, 1956.

29 Jan 2019

The case involves the right of a secured creditor, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., to file a winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956, after having...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Seeking Recovery of Security Deposit Under RDB Act. Security Deposit Refund Under Leave and License Agreement is Not a 'Debt' Under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, as It Does Not Arise from a Banking Transaction or Financial Assistance.

19 Oct 2018

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd., a private sector bank, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) at Pune, which ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors and Borrowers. Court Holds That Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act Provides an Alternative Remedy to Challenge Possession Notices and That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Should Not Be Entertained When Statutory Remedy Is Available.

5 Jul 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the Chief Metr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against SARFAESI Auction Sale for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to auction sale of secured assets fails as remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act before DRT was not exhausted.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Umang Sugars Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the auction sale of movable and immovable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)