Search Results for "Dealership"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 After Previous Arbitrator's Withdrawal Due to Ill Health

The High Court of Bombay heard two commercial arbitration applications filed by Applicants seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Petroleum Dealer Dispute. The court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, maintaining interim arrangement for running of petrol pump.

The appellant, M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating 'Halba' Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Court Holds Committee Lacked Jurisdiction Over Pre-2000 Certificates Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.

The petitioner, Shrirang Baburao Dhakate, was granted a Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) dealership in 1989 by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Civil Court Order Refusing Reference to Arbitration in Dealership Dispute. Arbitration Clause in Agreement Mandates Reference Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) and its dealer, M/s. Parshwa Auto Center. HPCL had issued a show-cause...