Search Results for "Dead Body Identification"

835 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 835 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole reliance on testimony of interested witnesses and failure to hold Test Identification Parade rendered identification doubtful.

The case pertains to the murder of Ketan Bansode and Siddiq Arkate on 14th August 2014 at around 9:30 PM near a hotel in Talwade, Pune. The first info...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Dead Body Pursuant to Disclosure Statement. Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 applied to hold accused liable for facts within their special knowledge.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Sikkim High Court maintaining the conviction and sentence of the appellants for the murder of Netai Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Aiwan Sonaji Ranshur, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and CCTV Footage Relied Upon by Prosecution Under Section 302 IPC Scrutinized for Gaps in Chain of Circumstances.

The matter arose from a criminal appeal filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging the judgment and order of convi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Train Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Santosh Changu Karnekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole dying declaration was not recorded in proper question-answer form and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the 3rd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of Mohammad Rafiq under Section 3...