Search Results for "DGFT notification"

63 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 63 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Delivers Order on Writ Petitions Challenging DGFT Policy Circulars on SEIS Eligibility and Show Cause Notices. The Court Addresses the Ultra Vires Nature of Circulars No. 06/2018 and 08/2018 under Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.

Two writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of Policy Circulars No. 06/2018 dated 22.05.2018 and No. 08/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Customs Appeals on Domestic Clearance of Duty-Free Input Products Under Advance Authorizations. Core Issue Whether Tribunal Correctly Interpreted Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Paras 4.1.3 and 4.1.5 to Permit Domestic Sales Before Export Obligation Fulfillment.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of 17 customs appeals filed by various companies and individuals against three Commissioners of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of ARE-1 Forms as Proof of Export Under Advance Authorisation Scheme. Court Holds That ARE-1 Forms Are Valid Proof of Export Under Paragraph 4.25 of Handbook of Procedures 2009-14 and Quashes Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, challenged a Letter dated 1-12-2016 and a Show C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits and Finally Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging RBI Circulars on Gold Import. Court Hears Arguments on Validity of Circulars Issued Under FEMA and Related Trade Policy.

The petitioners, a bullion dealing company and its directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash RBI Circula...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Whether Settlement Commission Erred in Not Considering Export Performance During Extended Period in EPCG Duty Case. Appellant Sought Recalculation of Customs Duty Based on 30% Export Obligation Achieved, Arguing That One-Year Extension Was Not Properly Accounted.

The appellant, M/s. Asianet Satellite Communication Limited, a service provider in television network, imported cable TV equipment valued at Rs.6,14,3...