Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Advocate Appearances and Vakalatnama Compliance in Court Proceedings. Supreme Court Bars Unauthorized Advocate Appearances, Reinforces Accountability in Legal Practice

The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 20.09.2024, had directed that only authorized advocates could mark their appearances in court, and the Advoca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India – Civil Appellate Jurisdiction – Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Limitation Period – Continuing Cause of Action – Error on Face of Record – Substantive Right Over Procedural Technicality – NCDRC Order Quashed and Set Aside.

Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 67 – Limitation Period to File Complaint – Continuing Cause of Action Upheld – NCDRC's Dismissal on Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Ruled on the Definition of ‘Consumer’ Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Loan Transactions

The Apex Court Held That a Borrower of a Project Loan Does Not Qualify as a ‘Consumer’ When the Loan is Availed for Commercial Purposes The Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Claim Repudiation — Non-Disclosure of Material Facts — Substantial Disclosure — Prudent Insurer Test — Reinstatement of Insurance Benefits with Interest

The Supreme Court held that the non-disclosure of additional policies did not amount to material suppression because the disclosed policy itself had a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Insurance Claim for Truck Damaged by Fire, Sets Aside National Commission’s Order. Court Holds National Permit Valid for Insurance Claim Despite Non-Payment of Authorization Fee for Interstate Movement.

Insurance Claim – The appellant, owner of a truck, filed an insurance claim after the vehicle caught fire due to a short circuit during the policy ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Earnest Money Forfeiture – Contractual Obligations – One-Sided Agreements – Consumer Protection

Forfeiture Clause – Valid But Limited to 10% of BSP – Contractual forfeiture of 20% BSP was excessive – Courts can interfere with unfair and one...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds LPG Distributorship Allotment Despite Allegations of Land Disqualification. Alternative Land Offered Due to Shifting Stance of Lessor – No Disability in Application – Allotment Process Upheld.

Land Disqualification – No Violation Found: The Court found no evidence that the 4th Respondent’s land offer violated guidelines – Field verific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Delayed Possession and Failure to Obtain Occupation Certificate -- Opp. Parties Project Found Deficient in Service Under Consumer Protection Act

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission disposed of two consumer complaints filed by complainants against Opp. Parties. The Complainants h...