Search Results for "Conclusive Proof"

1721 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1721 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory Fails. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sidram Baccharam Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur, for the murder of his wife Geeta under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances and recovery of weapon was doubtful.

The appellant, Arjun Puna Soni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Nagendra Singh, a carpenter, and sentenced ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction Under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Shadow Panch's Evidence Contradicted Complainant's Version.

The complainant, Pradip Jogi, sought a 7/12 extract with a loan entry from the accused, a Talathi, in November 2001. The accused allegedly demanded a ...