Search Results for "Coal supply"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Haryana Utilities Against APTEL Order on Tariff Revision for Adani Power. Court upholds CERC's power to grant compensatory tariff under Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 due to change in law and force majeure events.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 3rd November 2020, which dismissed the appeal filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act Case, Overturning High Court's Grant of First Right of Refusal. The Court Held That Section 11 of the Act Does Not Confer a First Right of Refusal and Upheld the Competitive Bidding Process for Appointing a Mine Developer-cum-Operator.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions concerning a dispute over the interpretation of Section 11 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Power Generator Against Termination of PPA — Holds That Failure to Secure Fuel Supply Agreement Does Not Justify Termination Where PPA Does Not Condition Power Supply on Specific Coal Source

The case involves a dispute between M/s Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. (appellant) and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and others (respondents), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute, Upholds Plausible Contract Interpretation. High Court Exceeded Section 37 Jurisdiction by Substituting Its Own Construction of Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement.

The dispute arose from a Coal Mining and Delivery Agreement (CMDA) executed on 16.07.2008 between Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (appellant) and Rajas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Renewal of Fuel Supply Agreements by Coal Consumers. Conditional Approval by Coal India Limited Does Not Create Enforceable Right to Renewal Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Industries Association and Soyabean Processors Association of India along with other industries, had entered into Fuel Suppl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions in Coal Supply Contract Dispute — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction. Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills Challenged, but Court Holds Alternative Remedy of Arbitration Available.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...