Search Results for "Coal India Limited"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Coal India Limited"

700 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 700 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act Case, Overturning High Court's Grant of First Right of Refusal. The Court Held That Section 11 of the Act Does Not Confer a First Right of Refusal and Upheld the Competitive Bidding Process for Appointing a Mine Developer-cum-Operator.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions concerning a dispute over the interpretation of Section 11 of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Coal Bearing Areas Act Case Over Land Premium Demand. The State Government is entitled to compensation as a 'person interested' under Section 2(d) and deemed lessor under Section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, beyond royalty payable under Section 18(a).

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a demand by the District Magistrate & Collector, Sambalpur, for Rs. 70 lakhs as premium for government land from Mahanadi Coalf...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Coal Supply Suspension — Holds That Non-Payment of Interest on Delayed Payments Does Not Justify Suspension of Coal Supply Under Fuel Supply Agreement. The court quashed communications suspending coal supply to a cement and paper manufacturing company, ruling that the Fuel Supply Agreement only permitted suspension for non-payment of principal amounts, not interest.

16 Jun 2014

The petitioners, Murli Industries Limited (a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956) and its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, filed two writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Coal India and Western Coalfields Against Temporary Injunction Restraining Cancellation of Letter of Assurance and Encashment of Bank Guarantee. The court held that the plaintiff had a prima facie case for breach of contract under the New Coal Distribution Policy 2007, and the balance of convenience favoured maintaining the status quo pending suit.

26 Jul 2011

The case arises from a dispute between Coal India Ltd. and Western Coalfields Ltd. (appellants) and Chintamani Agrotech (India) Ltd. (respondent/plain...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Renewal of Fuel Supply Agreements by Coal Consumers. Conditional Approval by Coal India Limited Does Not Create Enforceable Right to Renewal Under Article 226.

21 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Vidarbha Industries Association and Soyabean Processors Association of India along with other industries, had entered into Fuel Suppl...

Supreme Court

Visually Disabled Candidate Denied Job Gets Relief: Supreme Court Orders Appointment in Coal India Case (2026 INSC 53) Procedural technicalities like “expiry of recruitment panel” cannot defeat justice.

13 Jan 2026

Sujata Bora, a visually impaired candidate, applied for a Management Trainee post in Coal India in 2019 under the disability quota. She cleared the se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Coal Mine Development and Production Agreement for Non-Submission of Bank Guarantee Extension. Termination Without Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Held Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice Under Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, B. S. Ispat Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, emerged as the successful bidder in a tender...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

3 Nov 2022

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-Qualification Criteria in Mining Tender for Being Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Condition requiring prior experience in coal washery operation within a specified region held to be discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Bhatia Coal Washeries Ltd., challenged the pre-qualification criteria of Tender No. MSMC/MINING/2019/07 dated 16-8-2019 issued by the ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)