Search Results for "Cinematograph Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Cinematograph Rules"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Applicability of Section 292 IPC to Allegedly Obscene Poem Referencing Mahatma Gandhi Amidst Claims of Poetic License and Freedom of Expression. Court Clarifies That Poetic License Is Not a Legal License but a Fundamental Right, Subject to Reasonable Restrictions Under Article 19(2), and Obscenity Must Be Judged by Contemporary Community Standards.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case arose from the publication of a poem titled 'Gandhi Mala Bhetala' (I met Gandhi) in the July-August 1994 issue of the Bulletin, a...

High Court

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears Appeal against Single Judge's Order Directing CBFC to Issue Film Certificate. The appeal challenged the finding that referring the film to Revising Committee was without jurisdiction and the procedural fairness of the writ proceedings.

27 Jan 2026

The appeal arose from a writ petition (W.P.No.380 of 2026) filed by the respondent, a film producer, seeking to quash the decision of the Central Boar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Copyright Infringement Case, Upholding High Court's Restoration of Suit for Trial. The Court held that rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was premature as factual issues regarding applicability of Section 15(2) of Copyright Act, 1957, required determination on merits regarding whether engineering drawings constituted a 'design' under Designs Act, 2000, and were reproduced more than fifty times by industrial process.

15 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court adjudicated appeals arising from a copyright infringement dispute between Inox India Limited (the respondent) and Cryogas Equipment ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Direction in Public Interest Litigation on Cinema Hall Food Prohibition. The High Court's order directing cinema hall owners not to prohibit carrying outside food was challenged as exceeding jurisdiction under Article 226, with the Supreme Court considering the right to choice of food under Article 21 and the Jammu and Kashmir Cinemas (Regulation) Rules 1975.

3 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India considered appeals against a judgment dated 18 July 2018 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. The ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Seeking Ban on Film 'The Kashmir Files' for Alleged Hate Speech and Misrepresentation. Court holds that pre-censorship of a certified film is not permissible and that the film does not incite violence or hatred against any community.

23 Feb 2022

The judgment concerns three petitions filed before the Bombay High Court seeking a ban on the film 'The Kashmir Files' or revocation of its certificat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Multiplex Owners' Right to Entertainment Tax Subsidy Under Goa Scheme — State's Denial of Subsidy on Grounds of Non-Compliance with Scheme Conditions Set Aside. The court applied promissory estoppel and liberal interpretation of the Goa Entertainment Tax based Subsidy for Cinema Houses (Theatres) Scheme, 2004 to hold that multiplex owners are entitled to subsidy equal to entertainment tax paid.

12 Mar 2019

The State of Goa appealed against two judgments of the District Judge, North Goa, which directed the State to pay subsidy to multiplex owners under th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Projectionist in Qualification Dispute — License Obtained After Appointment Valid Under Rule 68(2-A) of Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1959. The court held that Rule 68(2-A) permits obtaining operator certificate within three months of appointment, and the appellant's acquisition after appointment was valid compliance.

24 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside the appointment of the appellant, Gangaram, as Proj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 420/511 IPC Charges in Money Lending Case Due to Absence of Deception. Default in Loan Repayment Does Not Constitute Cheating Under IPC When Initial Intention to Repay Existed.

28 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Ramesh Babulal Chaudhari, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking quashing of FIR No. 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC and FCAT Orders for Lack of Reasons in Film Certification — Directs Reconsideration of 'Beehad - the Ravine' Trailer, Songs, and Promos. Requirement of Recording Reasons Under Rule 22(8) and (9) of Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983 is a Mandatory Safeguard for Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Krishna Mishra (writer and director) and another (producer), challenged the certification orders of the Central Board of Film Certifi...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)