Search Results for "Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules"

537 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Temporary Employees Challenging Termination. Court holds that temporary employees have no right to continue beyond contractual period and termination without notice is valid under terms of appointment.

The petitioners, Vishnu Balaji Dhumal and others, were appointed as temporary employees (process servers, peons, etc.) in the Bombay High Court and su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CAT Order on Pay Fixation for Regularized Employees. Court holds that last pay drawn before regularization must be protected and seniority must be counted from initial appointment as casual labourers.

The petitioners, who were initially appointed as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized after several years. They filed Origina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Former OCS Employees Seeking Government Pension After Absorption in VSNL. Eligibility for Pension Under Office Memorandum Requires Minimum 10 Years of Qualifying Service on Date of Absorption.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of a challenge to the Judgment and Order dated January 13, 2016 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No...