Search Results for "CESTAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "CESTAT order"

321 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs in Central Excise Case — CESTAT Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Processing of Cotton Fabrics with Aid of Power Without Following Excise Procedures Constitutes Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

2 Dec 2025

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Rajkot against an order of the Customs, Excise and Servi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit Under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962. Assessee Claims That Requirement to Deposit 7.5% of Duty Demanded, Capped at Rs.10 Crores, Renders Appellate Remedy Illusory and Infringes Fundamental Rights to Trade and Livelihood.

7 Nov 2025

The petitioner, an importer of edible oils, challenged the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 before th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Customs Appeal Due to Bona Fide Prosecution Before Wrong Forum. The Court held that the period spent before the revisionary authority under a bona fide belief should be condoned, and the CESTAT erred in rejecting the application.

25 Jul 2023

The appellant, Zulfikar Abdul Rashid Khan, is a businessman dealing in motor vehicles and parts. A show cause notice dated 12 August 2011 was issued u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Directs Reconsideration of Application Under 'Litigation' Category. Petitioner's application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 rejected due to misclassification; court holds that mere pendency of appeal qualifies as 'litigation' and directs respondents to process application accordingly.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioners, Morde Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, Directs Substitution of Estimated Amount with Tax Dues as Per Adjudicated Order. The court held that for the purpose of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the 'tax dues' refer to the amount determined in the order-in-original, not the show cause notice, even if the order was set aside on appeal.

5 Nov 2020

The three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the respondents' action in issuing forms SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Modvat Credit Case — Upholds CESTAT's Order Setting Aside Demand and Penalty for Violation of Natural Justice. The demand under repealed Rule 57-I was invalid after substitution by CENVAT Rules 2002 and the assessee was denied effective opportunity of hearing.

1 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 27 May 2005 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

24 Jun 2014

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

1 Feb 2013

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)