Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

205 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election of Sarpanch and Upa Sarpanch — Holds That Election Must Be Held Within the Term of the Panchayat as Per Section 30 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. The court quashed the notice for election scheduled before the expiry of the existing Panchayat's term, ruling that such election would curtail the tenure of the existing body.

20 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Yogesh Pandharinath Dalvi and Sanjaykumar Dashrath Dubile, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the notice issu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

12 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Gram Panchayat Member Challenging Disqualification for Non-Payment of Tax — Disqualification Set Aside as Tax Bill Served on Brother Without Proof of Joint Family. Collector's Order Quashed for Lack of Specific Finding on Joint Family Status Under Section 16 r/w Section 14(h) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

3 Feb 2012

The Petitioner, Uttam H. Jadhav, was an elected member of the Gram Panchayat of Shinde, Taluka Nasik, District Nasik. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 initiated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dissolution of Gram Panchayat in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case — Section 145(1-A) Held Directory. Automatic Dissolution on Resignation of More Than 50% Members Set Aside as Remaining Members Can Function Effectively.

19 Dec 2025

The petitioners, three elected members of Gram Panchayat Jawala-Shahapur, challenged the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by the Divisional Commissioner,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Encroachment Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act — Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The Court held that the Collector must afford a hearing before declaring a vacancy under Section 16 read with Section 14(1)(j3) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

4 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Shantaram Narayan Raut, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Vinchur, in 2010 and subsequently became Sarpanch. Respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Encroachment on Government Land. Disqualification under Section 14(j3) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 is a continuing disqualification, and proceedings under Section 16 are maintainable even if encroachment is old.

30 Jan 2012

The Bombay High Court disposed of four writ petitions challenging orders of the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, which dismissed appeals agains...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(1)(j1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Children from Both Marriages Counted Regardless of Divorce; Belated Application Does Not Bar Disqualification.

5 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Ashok Balasaheb Chaugule, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat of Tardal, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur in 2007. Res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Challenge Raises Issue of Jurisdiction to Entertain Disqualification Complaint After Elections Without Filing Election Petition Under Section 15.

18 Sep 2012

The writ petition arose from proceedings under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The petitioner was elected from Ward No.4 of Gram Panchayat Kh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

10 Jan 2013

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)