Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats (Gram Sabha Meetings) Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats (Gram Sabha Meetings) Rules"

25 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Non-Service of Requisition Copy Under Rule 2(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 is Directory and Does Not Invalidate Motion When Sarpanch Had Notice and Participated.

28 Feb 2025

The Petitioner, Priyanka Abhijeet Deodhare, was the Sarpanch of Village Kaddhe, Taluka Khed, District Pune. Elections to the Gram Panchayat were held ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch for Gross Negligence and Misconduct Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act — Appellate Authority's Restoration Order Set Aside. The court held that failure to convene Gram Sabha meetings and misappropriation of funds constituted gross negligence and misconduct under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, and the appellate order was perverse.

10 Feb 2022

The case pertains to the removal of Respondent No.4, Radhakisan Laxman Mhetre, as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Nalwandi, Beed, under Section 39 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Formation of Panvel Municipal Corporation. The Court Held That the Formation of a Municipal Corporation Is a Legislative Function and Not Subject to Principles of Natural Justice Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioners, The Grampanchayat Kharghar and United Kharghar Action Committee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Members Challenging Complaint Against No-Confidence Motion. No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Upheld Despite Pending Appeal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

8 Apr 2010

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Mahadulla, moved a no-confidence motion against Sarpanch Smt. Nirmala Bonde on 5-8-2006, which was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Resolution and Tahsildar's Order in Land Dispute. Court upholds validity of resolution and order, finding no violation of natural justice or statutory provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, twelve residents of Sangav, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Sarpanch Challenging Removal Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Minister Failed to Consider Petitioner's Submissions, Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 39(3) of the Act.

7 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Vilas Bhagwat Jagtap, was elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Mudegaon in October 2017. Due to political rivalry, respondent no. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Secretary's Order Restricting Construction on Triangular Property for Traffic Safety Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act. The Court held that the Secretary's order under Section 178(2) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, prohibiting construction on a triangular plot to ensure road safety and visibility, was valid and not arbitrary.

20 Jul 2010

The case involves two writ petitions challenging an order dated 24/03/2003 passed by the Secretary to the Government of Goa (Panchayats) under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of OBC Reservation in Local Bodies — Directs State to Conduct Elections with OBC Reservation Based on Empirical Data. The court held that reservation for OBCs in Zilla Parishads and Municipal Councils must be based on quantifiable data regarding backwardness and inadequate representation, as mandated by Article 243D and Article 243T of the Constitution of India.

1 Apr 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of the reservation for Other Backward C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notifications Forming Panvel Municipal Corporation Under Article 226 of the Constitution. Petitioners Alleged Non-Compliance with Article 243Q and Section 4(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1961, Regarding Governor's Satisfaction and Consultation with Gram Sabha.

27 Oct 2016

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged various notifications issued under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Guardian Minister's Substitution of Zilla Parishad Works; Locus Standi of Chairman Examined. Petition Seeks Quashing of Substituted Works List Under Rural Roads Development Project Alleging Illegal Interference by Guardian Minister and District Planning Committee Contrary to Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Act, 1961 and Maharashtra District Planning Committees Act, 1998.

13 Apr 2012

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Chairman of the Finance and Works Committee of Zilla Parishad, Bhand...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)